data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40856/4085649fc5afed5a4227d20b3e288c1636683f01" alt=""
If you thought these things, you'd be wrong.
The latest showcase of Artest's mad skillz in the field of animal care came on Sunday, when animal control officers took possession of his Great Dane--whom Artest calls "Socks" but the president of Friends of Placer County Animal Shelter Rosemary Frieborn more colorfully describes as "a rack of bones"--because he wasn't feeding it. In defense of his actions, Artest stated, "I love my dogs and think they should be able to live (as) freely as possible".
Way to be, Ron. Unlike most nancypants pet owners, you understand that for an animal to truly be free, it has to be left alone for days at a time without food to fend for itself. And if they should happen to die as a result, that just means that they didn't appreciate their freedom.
2 comments:
I think that dogs definitely should be allowed to have their share of freedom....
I think those might be some patriotic dogs now, willing to give up a few freedoms in order to make this a safer country.
Post a Comment